awesome!
Sony & co still gonna make billions so stop crying!
It's old men living in the past making these competitions!
Don't really care for GT or driving sims.. But this video review is embarrassing! What the hell is he talking about? Mixed messages anyone?
the 19gib torrent is FAKE!
It's actually Yakuza 4..
Don't know about the 13Gib one.. That one doesn't work..
NOT TRUE!
The torrent her refers to is a FAKE.
The one that is 19.06 GiB is actually Yakuza 4, so all this is just bull..
There's another torrent up that's 13.75GiB but as far as i know it doesn't work so could be fake as well..
So.. Now you guys know..
Please Guerilla!! Kill Rico!! He ruins Kill Zone!!
A big LOL to all turds who still thinks the PS3version is inferior.. The differences are MINIMAL! All this talk about huge differences was way exaggerated all along! Just as i tried to explain!
I actually feel a bit sorry for the guy.. But a couple of 100$ of laser treatments and a nice cover-up by a skillful tattooist should fix the problem!
that does NOT look like Kratos!! For a realistic tattoo, it's not good at all..
this is bullsh*t!
Don't believe all the hate! The game runs just fine on PS3 even if it runs a little better on 360. And to all you dissagreers, you haven't tried the PS3version. If you had, you would know all these problems with that version is hugly exaggerated!!
The PS3 version certainly looks "blurrier" BUT, looking at all these picture comparisons, i don't think it looks worse than the 360 version in any way! Just blurrier/smoother (call it what you want) up close. And i personally think the PS3 one runs smooth enough considering the size. I haven't played the 360 one but apparently the performance is a bit smoother from what i read. But keep in mind the latest GTAIV update noticeably improved the frame rate on the PS3 version. <...
hahaha!
Reading this thread almost makes you think that the PS3-version would look like a PS2-game.. I tried the PS3-version and it looks stunning! Havent tried the 360-version but even if it runs a little bit smoother and has slightly higher resolution doesnt mean that the PS3-version is broken..
It's a big western cultural phenomena. Big budget, more or less realistic, best selling & highly popular war games/simulators set in real present day war zones. Off course it will affect people! I would guess it's a quite effective way to make war a more interesting and comfortable thought..
Have you not read one review of this game? I think most of the reviews state that this is one of the best looking games yet this generation considering the sheer size of it!
How can one love the military? I mean, love the concept of war?
edit: sorry, i think i misread your post a little..
The question is; is it intentionally!? By the people funding/developing the games!?
The 360 version of GTA IV (among lots of other multigames) had a SLIGHT graphical advantage.. But it's so slight that you have to compare both versions side by side to notice any difference at all. (some reviewers even stated that the PS3-version had the upper hand) In other words, it won't affect the experience in any way. These differences are exaggerated by 30 year old virgins counting pixels and trolling fanboys shouting their mouths of in forum threads.. I read/heard that Bioshoc...
"This reviewer, after finding himself an 8 out of 10 on the agitated scale, realized that taunting and knocking down citizens were more fun than trying to search for the impossible-to-find location of the next objective."
lol! Skate3-goozernation, 1-0..
well, it's true..